Analyze both stories. Is the author's suggestions a good solution to Essay

Analyze both stories. Is the authors suggestions a darling solution to solving a problem - Essay ExampleOn the other hand, the Houyhnhnms see themselves as superior to the Yahoos because they be more rational, thus giving the former the right to gestate power over the latters life and death (Lemke, Martin, Fuentes, and Swift 47). Justifying Infanticide depicts how Singer sees himself as a rational Houyhnhnm who should have a power to influence over the life and death of those considered non-humans, or those who ar not yet humans. However, Swifts aim is to make people realize that humans atomic number 18 indeed Yahoos with pure genetic composition and the propensity towards sensual pleasures, but are also Houyhnhnms with rational thinking and the propensity towards oversimplifications and ideas. In Justifying Infanticide, Singer separate these two --- intelligence and incarnation --- by referring to newborns not as persons, but merely pain-receptors having no psychological assoc iation to its future personhood (33). Therefore, if one follows this line of intellecting, newborns are Yahoos whose life and death are under the decision of the superior Houyhnhnms. A Modest Proposal is entirely different since it is a satirical exaggeration that states exchange the children as food to rich people may alleviate the poor parents economic situation (Swift 13). Justifying Infanticide Justifying Infanticide has a utilitarian root that reinforces the concept of doing the greatest good for the greatest number. It says that a deed is made moral if the end justifies the means. In line with this thought, Singer theorizes that eliminating a certain percentage of the population is acceptable if reassert by the situation or the result it offers (34-5). According to the utilitarian point of view, objections from people who perceive that killing a person is morally incorrect are mostly based on emotions. Utilitarianism asserts the belief that reason should be the main basis o f ethics, so it means that infanticide can be justified by reason in some cases, thus be deemed ethical (Sloane 47-8). For a clearer definition of terms, infanticide is the intentional killing of an infant for reasons ranging from partiality to a specific gender to fancy of population (Vehmas 38). Utilitarian Peter Singer provides the most controversial defense of infanticide. For example, Singer states that the costs to families and societies and the quality of life in caring for children with specific disabilities imply more effort but provides less positive results (35). This may be a controversial stance, but on a realistic viewpoint, the child will live a life that is considered unhappy or unwanted by most people. This is one case where infanticide is considered humane (Sloane 48). One great difficulty, however, is in deciding when this is justifiable because there is always the argument that no one can really say when a certain life is undesirable other than that truly pers on. However, one strong defense of infanticide in the utilitarian standpoint is the argument against the suffering infant whose medical case is beyond the scientific capacity to bring back (Vehmas 39). For Singer, it is more altruistic to allow parents to choose to end their and their childs suffering through euthanasia (36). A Modest Proposal The lack of pity towards the poverty-stricken citizens is the target of Swift